12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Viking Fourtech vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

Viking
Fourtech
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Aantal tests
5
3
4
3
24
Beste positie
#11
#1
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
17.0
1.3
3.3
3.7
2.7
Laatste test
2021
2026
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
32
23
40
36
302

Nat

Nat
Viking Fourtech
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
59%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Viking Fourtech
96%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Viking Fourtech
55%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Remmen op sneeuw
Viking Fourtech
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Sneeuw in bochten
Viking Fourtech
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Sneeuwverwerking
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Tractie op sneeuw
Viking Fourtech
51%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Kilometrage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Rolweerstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Viking Fourtech
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Buitengeluid
Viking Fourtech
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Soelaas
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%

Droog

Droog
Viking Fourtech
59%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Droogremmen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Droge behandeling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking