12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Viking Fourtech vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

Viking
Fourtech
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Aantal tests
5
49
17
24
Beste positie
#11
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
17.0
3.2
1.7
2.7
Laatste test
2021
2024
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
32
213
80
302

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Viking Fourtech
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Viking Fourtech
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Viking Fourtech
55%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Viking Fourtech
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Sneeuw
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Sneeuw in bochten
Viking Fourtech
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Sneeuwverwerking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Tractie op sneeuw
Viking Fourtech
51%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Remmen op sneeuw
Viking Fourtech
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Kosten
Viking Fourtech
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Prijs/waarde
Viking Fourtech
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Rolweerstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kilometrage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Soelaas
Viking Fourtech
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Buitengeluid
Viking Fourtech
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Soelaas
Viking Fourtech
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Droog
Viking Fourtech
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Droogremmen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Droge behandeling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store