12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Viking FourTech Plus vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

Viking
FourTech Plus
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Aantal tests
5
3
29
24
Beste positie
#9
#4
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
4.3
3.7
2.7
Laatste test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
24
99
180
302

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Confidence
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Sneeuw
Confidence
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Sneeuwverwerking
Viking FourTech Plus
55%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Tractie op sneeuw
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Remmen op sneeuw
Viking FourTech Plus
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Sneeuw in bochten
Viking FourTech Plus
58%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Soelaas
Confidence
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Buitengeluid
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Soelaas
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Droog
Confidence
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Droogremmen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Droge behandeling
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Kosten
Confidence
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Prijs/waarde
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Rolweerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kilometrage
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store