12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Viking FourTech Plus vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Viking
FourTech Plus
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
5
24
17
14
Beste positie
#9
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
2.7
1.7
3.6
Laatste test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
24
302
80
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Sneeuw
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Tractie op sneeuw
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Remmen op sneeuw
Viking FourTech Plus
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Sneeuw in bochten
Viking FourTech Plus
58%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Sneeuwverwerking
Viking FourTech Plus
55%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Droog
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droge behandeling
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droogremmen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolweerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Prijs/waarde
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Soelaas
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store