12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Viking FourTech Plus vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Viking
FourTech Plus
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
5
17
24
14
Beste positie
#9
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
1.7
2.7
3.6
Laatste test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
24
80
302
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Sneeuw
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Sneeuw in bochten
Viking FourTech Plus
58%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Sneeuwverwerking
Viking FourTech Plus
55%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Tractie op sneeuw
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Remmen op sneeuw
Viking FourTech Plus
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Soelaas
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Droog
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droogremmen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge behandeling
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Prijs/waarde
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Rolweerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store