12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Viking FourTech Plus vs. Ceat WinterDrive vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

Viking
FourTech Plus
Ceat
WinterDrive
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Aantal tests
5
4
49
24
Beste positie
#9
#10
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
12.0
17.0
3.2
2.7
Laatste test
2025
2025
2024
2025
Beschikbare maten
24
37
213
302

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Ceat WinterDrive
43%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Ceat WinterDrive
34%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Ceat WinterDrive
50%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Ceat WinterDrive
27%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Ceat WinterDrive
55%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Ceat WinterDrive
51%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Sneeuw
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Ceat WinterDrive
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Sneeuwverwerking
Viking FourTech Plus
55%
Ceat WinterDrive
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Tractie op sneeuw
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Ceat WinterDrive
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Remmen op sneeuw
Viking FourTech Plus
81%
Ceat WinterDrive
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Sneeuw in bochten
Viking FourTech Plus
58%
Ceat WinterDrive
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Droog
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Ceat WinterDrive
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Droogremmen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Droge behandeling
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Ceat WinterDrive
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Ceat WinterDrive
50%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Prijs/waarde
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Ceat WinterDrive
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Rolweerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Ceat WinterDrive
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kilometrage
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Ceat WinterDrive
1%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Soelaas
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Ceat WinterDrive
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Buitengeluid
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Ceat WinterDrive
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Soelaas
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store