Vergelijking: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Bovenmidden

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19

VS

Premie

Michelin

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

MS plus 77

ALPIN 6

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Aantal tests

19

31

49

23

Best position

#3

#1

Average position

11.2

4.4

3.2

3.3

Laatste test

2021

2024

2025

Beschikbare maten

76

213

176

Prestatievergelijking

Gemiddeld uit 2 tests

Natte prestaties

79%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

86%

Michelin

ALPIN 6

87%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Remmen op nat wegdek

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Michelin ALPIN 6

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

97%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Michelin ALPIN 6

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

93%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Uniroyal MS plus 77

76%

Michelin ALPIN 6

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Aquaplaning longitudinaal

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Michelin ALPIN 6

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Aquaplaning transversaal

Uniroyal MS plus 77

86%

Michelin ALPIN 6

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

95%

Droge prestaties

77%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

85%

Michelin

ALPIN 6

87%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Droogremmen

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Michelin ALPIN 6

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Droge behandeling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Michelin ALPIN 6

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Sneeuwprestaties

85%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

79%

Michelin

ALPIN 6

77%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

92%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Remmen op sneeuw

Uniroyal MS plus 77

94%

Michelin ALPIN 6

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

96%

Tractie op sneeuw

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Michelin ALPIN 6

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

96%

Sneeuwverwerking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Michelin ALPIN 6

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Bochten op sneeuw in cirkel

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Michelin ALPIN 6

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Comfort & geluid

78%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

78%

Michelin

ALPIN 6

82%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

86%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Exterieurgeluid

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Michelin ALPIN 6

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Rijcomfort

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Michelin ALPIN 6

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Economie

78%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

93%

Michelin

ALPIN 6

85%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

83%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Rolweerstand

Uniroyal MS plus 77

88%

Michelin ALPIN 6

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Kilometrage

Uniroyal MS plus 77

68%

Michelin ALPIN 6

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Organisatie	Seizoen	Jaar	Maat
Autobild	Winter	2020	225/55 R17	Bekijk
Autobild	Winter	2019	225/45 R17	Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Vergelijking: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

MS plus 77

ALPIN 6

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Test profile

Prestatievergelijking

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking