Vergelijking: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Bovenmidden

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19

VS

Premie

Hankook

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

MS plus 77

Ventus Evo

UltraGrip Performance+

PremiumContact 7

Aantal tests

19

3

23

26

Beste positie

#3

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

11.2

3.3

2.2

Laatste test

2021

2026

2025

2026

Beschikbare maten

76

60

176

66

Nat

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Sneeuw

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Sneeuwverwerking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Tractie op sneeuw

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Remmen op sneeuw

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Sneeuw in bochten

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Kosten

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Kilometrage

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Rolweerstand

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Prijs/waarde

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Soelaas

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Buitengeluid

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Soelaas

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Inwendig geluid

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

Droog

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Droogremmen

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Droge behandeling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Ijs

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

MS plus 77

Ventus Evo

UltraGrip Performance+

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Nat

Sneeuw

Kosten

Soelaas

Droog

Ijs

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking