12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Uniroyal MS plus 77Bovenmidden
UniroyalUniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001Premie
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premie
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

9.5
R14 – R22
Vergelijk ook met
PILOT ALPIN 5 WinterContact TS 870 UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Aantal tests
19
15
14
24
Beste positie
#3
#4
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
11.2
7.9
3.6
2.7
Laatste test
2021
2018
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
76
132
194
302

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Sneeuw
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Tractie op sneeuw
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Remmen op sneeuw
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Sneeuwverwerking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Sneeuw in bochten
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Prestaties op sneeuw
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Kosten
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Kilometrage
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Rolweerstand
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Prijs/waarde
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Soelaas
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
50%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Buitengeluid
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Soelaas
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Inwendig geluid
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
33%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Droog
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Droge behandeling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Droogremmen
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Ijs
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
23%
Remmen op ijs
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
23%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste winterbanden voor sneeuwBeste banden voor elektrische voertuigenBeste ijsbandenBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Vergelijk ook

Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs Kleber KRISALP HP3Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs Uniroyal WinterExpertUniroyal MS plus 77 vs BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs Dunlop Winter Sport 5Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Bladeren op merk

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store