12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Tristar Ice-Plus S210 vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Tristar
Ice-Plus S210
Michelin
Pilot Sport 5
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
2
15
3
4
Beste positie
#10
#1
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
29.5
3.4
3.7
3.3
Laatste test
2019
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
31
70
36
40

Nat

Nat
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
49%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
47%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
71%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
68%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Droog

Droog
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droge behandeling
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Droogremmen
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
89%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
79%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
78%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking