12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Tristar Ice-Plus S210 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Tristar
Ice-Plus S210
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
2
4
4
Beste positie
#10
#3
#2
Gemiddelde positie
29.5
12.0
3.3
Laatste test
2019
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
31
111
40

Nat

Nat
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
49%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
47%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Droog

Droog
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droogremmen
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Droge behandeling
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking