12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Tristar Ice-Plus S210 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofiel

Tristar
Ice-Plus S210
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Aantal tests
2
3
10
Beste positie
#10
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
29.5
3.3
6.0
Laatste test
2019
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
31
40
104

Nat

Nat
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
49%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Droog

Droog
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Droge behandeling
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Droogremmen
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Soelaas

Soelaas
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Buitengeluid
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolweerstand
Tristar Ice-Plus S210
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking