Vergelijking: Toyo Celsius vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Bovenmidden

Toyo

Celsius

R14 – R20

VS

Bovenmidden

Kumho

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

Celsius

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Aantal tests

7

10

4

3

1

Beste positie

#7

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

12.9

6.0

3.3

3.7

1.0

Laatste test

2022

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

75

109

40

36

66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Toyo Celsius

49%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Toyo Celsius

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Toyo Celsius

51%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Toyo Celsius

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Toyo Celsius

46%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droog

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droge behandeling

Toyo Celsius

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droogremmen

Toyo Celsius

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Buitengeluid

Toyo Celsius

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolweerstand

Toyo Celsius

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Best snow tyres Best tyres for evs Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Beste handling banden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Vergelijk ook

Toyo Celsius vs Continental AllSeasonContact

Toyo Celsius vs Michelin CrossClimate+

Toyo Celsius vs Nokian WeatherProof

Toyo Celsius vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: Toyo Celsius vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Celsius

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Testprofiel

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking