Vergelijking: Syron Everest 1 plus vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Dunlop Winter

Budget

Syron

Everest 1 plus

R13 – R16

VS

Bovenmidden

Uniroyal

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Everest 1 plus

MS plus 77

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak LM-005

Winter

Aantal tests

2

19

23

49

2

Best position

#9

#3

#1

Average position

27.0

11.2

3.3

3.2

1.5

Laatste test

2020

2021

2025

2024

2025

Beschikbare maten

14

76

176

213

65

Nat

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Syron Everest 1 plus

69%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Syron Everest 1 plus

62%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Syron Everest 1 plus

77%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Syron Everest 1 plus

61%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Syron Everest 1 plus

64%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Sneeuw

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Remmen op sneeuw

Syron Everest 1 plus

84%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Sneeuw in bochten

Syron Everest 1 plus

86%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Sneeuwverwerking

Syron Everest 1 plus

76%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Dunlop Winter

79%

Tractie op sneeuw

Syron Everest 1 plus

86%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Soelaas

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Soelaas

Syron Everest 1 plus

61%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Buitengeluid

Syron Everest 1 plus

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Droog

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Droogremmen

Syron Everest 1 plus

73%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Droge behandeling

Syron Everest 1 plus

42%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Kosten

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Rolweerstand

Syron Everest 1 plus

50%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Syron Everest 1 plus vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Dunlop Winter

Everest 1 plus

MS plus 77

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak LM-005

Winter

Test profile

Nat

Sneeuw

Soelaas

Droog

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking