12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Riken Road Performance vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofiel

Riken
Road Performance
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Aantal tests
1
16
10
Beste positie
#1
#3
#2
Gemiddelde positie
1.0
5.5
6.0
Laatste test
2025
2023
2026
Beschikbare maten
27
153
109

Nat

Nat
Riken Road Performance
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Riken Road Performance
63%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Riken Road Performance
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Riken Road Performance
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%

Droog

Droog
Riken Road Performance
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Droogremmen
Riken Road Performance
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%

Kosten

Kosten
Riken Road Performance
67%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Kilometrage
Riken Road Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Riken Road Performance
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Buitengeluid
Riken Road Performance
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking