Vergelijking: Riken Road Performance vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Riken

Road Performance

R15 – R16

VS

Premie

Hankook

ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8

R15 – R20

Vergelijk ook met

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Testprofiel

Road Performance

ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Aantal tests

—

1

18

Beste positie

—

#1

Gemiddelde positie

—

1.0

6.1

Laatste test

—

2025

2024

Beschikbare maten

—

64

47

Nat

Riken Road Performance

70%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Riken Road Performance

63%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Riken Road Performance

76%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Riken Road Performance

74%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Droog

Riken Road Performance

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Droogremmen

Riken Road Performance

74%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Kosten

Riken Road Performance

67%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Kilometrage

Riken Road Performance

67%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Soelaas

Riken Road Performance

74%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Buitengeluid

Riken Road Performance

74%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Riken Road Performance vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Road Performance

ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Kosten

Soelaas

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking