12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Riken Road Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Riken
Road Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
3
3
14
Beste positie
#2
#4
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
4.3
3.6
Laatste test
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
97
188

Nat

Nat
Riken Road Performance
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Riken Road Performance
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Riken Road Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Droog

Droog
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Droogremmen
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%

Kosten

Kosten
Riken Road Performance
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kilometrage
Riken Road Performance
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking