12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Riken Road Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Riken Road Performance
RikenRiken

Road Performance

R15 – R16
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Kumho Ecsta HS52Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Vergelijk ook met
PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

Riken
Road Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Aantal tests
—
3
10
Beste positie
—
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
—
3.3
6.0
Laatste test
—
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
—
40
104

Nat

Nat
Riken Road Performance
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Riken Road Performance
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Riken Road Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Droog

Droog
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Droogremmen
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Kosten

Kosten
Riken Road Performance
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Kilometrage
Riken Road Performance
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Buitengeluid
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking