12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Riken Road Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Riken Road Performance
RikenRiken

Road Performance

R15 – R16
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental UltraContact NXTPremie
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Vergelijk ook met
PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Testprofiel

Riken
Road Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Aantal tests
—
3
2
Beste positie
—
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
—
3.3
1.0
Laatste test
—
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
—
40
23

Nat

Nat
Riken Road Performance
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Riken Road Performance
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Riken Road Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%

Droog

Droog
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Droogremmen
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%

Kosten

Kosten
Riken Road Performance
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kilometrage
Riken Road Performance
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Buitengeluid
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking