12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Riken Road Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Riken
Road Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
3
49
3
Beste positie
#2
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
3.3
3.2
3.7
Laatste test
2026
2024
2025
Beschikbare maten
40
213
34

Nat

Nat
Riken Road Performance
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Riken Road Performance
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Riken Road Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Droog

Droog
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Riken Road Performance
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometrage
Riken Road Performance
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking