12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Riken Road Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Riken
Road Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Falken
e.Ziex
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
16
1
3
3
Beste positie
#3
#1
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
5.5
1.0
3.7
3.7
Laatste test
2023
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
153
27
34
34

Nat

Nat
Riken Road Performance
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Riken Road Performance
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Riken Road Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Riken Road Performance
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Riken Road Performance
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Riken Road Performance
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Droog

Droog
Riken Road Performance
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
Riken Road Performance
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Riken Road Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometrage
Riken Road Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking