Vergelijking: Riken Road Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Riken

Road Performance

R15 – R16

VS

Premie

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Vergelijk ook met

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Testprofiel

Road Performance

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

Aantal tests

—

18

1

Beste positie

—

#1

Gemiddelde positie

—

6.1

1.0

Laatste test

—

2024

2025

Beschikbare maten

—

47

64

Nat

Riken Road Performance

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Riken Road Performance

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Riken Road Performance

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Riken Road Performance

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Droog

Riken Road Performance

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droogremmen

Riken Road Performance

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Kosten

Riken Road Performance

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kilometrage

Riken Road Performance

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Soelaas

Riken Road Performance

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Buitengeluid

Riken Road Performance

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Riken Road Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Road Performance

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Kosten

Soelaas

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking