12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Riken Road Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Riken Road Performance
RikenRiken

Road Performance

R15 – R16
Firestone RoadhawkBovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Riken
Road Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
—
21
3
Beste positie
—
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
—
11.9
3.3
Laatste test
—
2024
2026
Beschikbare maten
—
164
40

Nat

Nat
Riken Road Performance
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Riken Road Performance
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Riken Road Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Droog

Droog
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Droogremmen
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Kosten

Kosten
Riken Road Performance
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometrage
Riken Road Performance
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Buitengeluid
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking