12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Riken Road Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Riken Road Performance
RikenRiken

Road Performance

R15 – R16
Firestone Roadhawk 2Bovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

Riken
Road Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
—
6
3
Beste positie
—
#3
#2
Gemiddelde positie
—
4.7
3.3
Laatste test
—
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
—
146
40

Nat

Nat
Riken Road Performance
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Riken Road Performance
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Riken Road Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Riken Road Performance
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometrage
Riken Road Performance
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Buitengeluid
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Droog

Droog
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Droogremmen
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking