12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Riken Road Performance vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Riken
Road Performance
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
14
1
4
Beste positie
#9
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
19.7
1.0
3.3
Laatste test
2024
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
147
66
40

Nat

Nat
Riken Road Performance
70%
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Riken Road Performance
63%
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Riken Road Performance
76%
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Riken Road Performance
74%
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%

Droog

Droog
Riken Road Performance
74%
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droogremmen
Riken Road Performance
74%
Cooper Zeon CS8
59%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%

Kosten

Kosten
Riken Road Performance
67%
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometrage
Riken Road Performance
67%
Cooper Zeon CS8
63%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Riken Road Performance
74%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Riken Road Performance
74%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking