12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Riken Road Performance vs. Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Riken Road Performance
RikenRiken

Road Performance

R15 – R16
Apollo Alnac 4GBudget
ApolloApollo

Alnac 4G

2.3
R14 – R17
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Vergelijk ook met
WinterContact TS 870 PremiumContact 7 Cinturato P7 C2

Testprofiel

Riken
Road Performance
Apollo
Alnac 4G
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Aantal tests
—
8
18
Beste positie
—
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
—
18.9
6.1
Laatste test
—
2023
2024
Beschikbare maten
—
77
47

Nat

Nat
Riken Road Performance
70%
Apollo Alnac 4G
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Riken Road Performance
63%
Apollo Alnac 4G
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Riken Road Performance
76%
Apollo Alnac 4G
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Riken Road Performance
74%
Apollo Alnac 4G
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Riken Road Performance
74%
Apollo Alnac 4G
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Buitengeluid
Riken Road Performance
74%
Apollo Alnac 4G
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Droog

Droog
Riken Road Performance
74%
Apollo Alnac 4G
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Droogremmen
Riken Road Performance
74%
Apollo Alnac 4G
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Riken Road Performance
67%
Apollo Alnac 4G
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kilometrage
Riken Road Performance
67%
Apollo Alnac 4G
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Wederzijdse tests

OrganisatieSeizoenJaarMaat
ADACADAC
De zomer
2023205/55 R16Bekijk
AutobildAutobild
De zomer
2021205/55 R16Bekijk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking