Vergelijking: Radar Dimax Alpine vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Budget

Radar

Dimax Alpine

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Dimax Alpine

Eskimo HP2

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Aantal tests

6

15

49

23

Best position

#9

#6

#1

Average position

25.3

15.5

3.2

3.3

Laatste test

2024

2025

2024

2025

Beschikbare maten

59

28

213

176

Nat

Radar Dimax Alpine

53%

Sava Eskimo HP2

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Radar Dimax Alpine

53%

Sava Eskimo HP2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Radar Dimax Alpine

51%

Sava Eskimo HP2

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Radar Dimax Alpine

52%

Sava Eskimo HP2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Radar Dimax Alpine

65%

Sava Eskimo HP2

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Radar Dimax Alpine

50%

Sava Eskimo HP2

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Sneeuw

Radar Dimax Alpine

82%

Sava Eskimo HP2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Sneeuwverwerking

Radar Dimax Alpine

90%

Sava Eskimo HP2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Tractie op sneeuw

Radar Dimax Alpine

57%

Sava Eskimo HP2

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Remmen op sneeuw

Radar Dimax Alpine

84%

Sava Eskimo HP2

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Sneeuw in bochten

Radar Dimax Alpine

86%

Sava Eskimo HP2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Soelaas

Radar Dimax Alpine

71%

Sava Eskimo HP2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Buitengeluid

Radar Dimax Alpine

95%

Sava Eskimo HP2

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Soelaas

Radar Dimax Alpine

46%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Droog

Radar Dimax Alpine

81%

Sava Eskimo HP2

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Droogremmen

Radar Dimax Alpine

84%

Sava Eskimo HP2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Droge behandeling

Radar Dimax Alpine

77%

Sava Eskimo HP2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Kosten

Radar Dimax Alpine

38%

Sava Eskimo HP2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Rolweerstand

Radar Dimax Alpine

38%

Sava Eskimo HP2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Wederzijdse tests

Organisatie	Seizoen	Jaar	Maat
Autobild	Winter	2022	215/55 R17	Bekijk
Autobild	Winter	2020	245/45 R18	Bekijk

Vergelijking: Radar Dimax Alpine vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Dimax Alpine

Eskimo HP2

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Test profile

Nat

Sneeuw

Soelaas

Droog

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Wederzijdse tests

Voeg toe aan vergelijking