Vergelijking: Point S Winter S vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Point

S Winter S

4.4

R17 – R19

VS

Premie

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak 6

9.1

R16 – R22

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

S Winter S

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak 6

Aantal tests

2

23

14

Beste positie

#17

#1

Gemiddelde positie

21.0

3.3

3.6

Laatste test

2025

Beschikbare maten

3

176

188

Nat

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Remmen op nat wegdek

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Sneeuw

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Remmen op sneeuw

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Tractie op sneeuw

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Droog

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Droogremmen

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Ijs

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Remmen op ijs

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Kosten

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kilometrage

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Point S Winter S vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

S Winter S

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Nat

Sneeuw

Droog

Ijs

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking