Vergelijking: Point S Winter S vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Point

S Winter S

4.4

R17 – R19

VS

Premie

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

Blizzak LM-005

8.2

R14 – R22

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

S Winter S

UltraGrip Performance 3

Blizzak LM-005

Aantal tests

2

24

49

Beste positie

#17

#1

Gemiddelde positie

21.0

2.7

3.2

Laatste test

2025

2024

Beschikbare maten

3

302

213

Nat

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Remmen op nat wegdek

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Sneeuw

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Tractie op sneeuw

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Remmen op sneeuw

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Ijs

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Remmen op ijs

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Kosten

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Kilometrage

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Droog

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Droogremmen

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Point S Winter S vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

S Winter S

UltraGrip Performance 3

Blizzak LM-005

Testprofiel

Nat

Sneeuw

Ijs

Kosten

Droog

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking