12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Point S Winter S vs. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Point
S Winter S
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
2
13
24
14
Beste positie
#17
#7
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
21.0
11.9
2.7
3.6
Laatste test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
3
78
302
188

Nat

Nat
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
58%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
52%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Remmen op sneeuw
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Tractie op sneeuw
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%

Kosten

Kosten
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kilometrage
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
54%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%

Droog

Droog
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Droogremmen
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking