Vergelijking: Pirelli P ZERO vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premie

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Premie

GoodYear

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Testprofiel

P ZERO

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Aantal tests

17

3

2

5

3

Beste positie

#1

#2

#1

#2

Gemiddelde positie

6.1

3.3

1.0

2.2

3.7

Laatste test

2020

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

330

40

23

63

34

Nat

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Droog

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Droogremmen

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Droge behandeling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Droge stuurrespons

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Kosten

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolweerstand

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometrage

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Soelaas

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Buitengeluid

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Pirelli P ZERO vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

P ZERO

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Kosten

Soelaas

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking