Vergelijking: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premie

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Premie

Continental

Vergelijk ook met

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

P ZERO

EcoContact 6

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Aantal tests

17

5

6

3

1

5

Beste positie

#1

#7

#3

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

6.1

13.0

4.7

3.3

1.0

2.2

Laatste test

2020

2022

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

330

676

146

40

64

63

Nat

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

Continental EcoContact 6

60%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

Continental EcoContact 6

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Continental EcoContact 6

57%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

Continental EcoContact 6

40%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

Continental EcoContact 6

66%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

Continental EcoContact 6

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Droog

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

Continental EcoContact 6

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Droogremmen

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Droge behandeling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Continental EcoContact 6

70%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kosten

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

Continental EcoContact 6

93%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolweerstand

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

Continental EcoContact 6

100%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Kilometrage

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

Continental EcoContact 6

89%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Soelaas

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

Continental EcoContact 6

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Buitengeluid

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

Continental EcoContact 6

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Soelaas

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

P ZERO

EcoContact 6

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Kosten

Soelaas

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking