12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Pirelli CARRIER vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Testprofiel

Pirelli
CARRIER
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Aantal tests
1
1
18
15
Beste positie
#3
#1
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
3.0
1.0
6.1
9.0
Laatste test
2019
2025
2024
2025
Beschikbare maten
54
64
47
225

Nat

Nat
Pirelli CARRIER
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Pirelli CARRIER
89%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Pirelli CARRIER
77%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Pirelli CARRIER
56%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Pirelli CARRIER
89%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Pirelli CARRIER
67%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Pirelli CARRIER
72%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Buitengeluid
Pirelli CARRIER
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Droog

Droog
Pirelli CARRIER
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Kosten

Kosten
Pirelli CARRIER
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Kilometrage
Pirelli CARRIER
90%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking