12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Petlas Snowmaster W651 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Petlas
Snowmaster W651
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
6
4
3
14
Beste positie
#9
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
38.0
3.3
3.7
3.6
Laatste test
2023
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
11
40
36
194

Nat

Nat
Petlas Snowmaster W651
37%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Petlas Snowmaster W651
43%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Petlas Snowmaster W651
4%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Petlas Snowmaster W651
33%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Petlas Snowmaster W651
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
Petlas Snowmaster W651
98%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Remmen op sneeuw
Petlas Snowmaster W651
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Sneeuwverwerking
Petlas Snowmaster W651
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Tractie op sneeuw
Petlas Snowmaster W651
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%

Droog

Droog
Petlas Snowmaster W651
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droogremmen
Petlas Snowmaster W651
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge behandeling
Petlas Snowmaster W651
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking