Vergelijking: Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Budget

Petlas

Imperium PT515

VS

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofiel

Imperium PT515

Roadhawk

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Aantal tests

5

21

4

2

3

Beste positie

#13

#2

#3

#1

#2

Gemiddelde positie

24.0

11.9

12.0

1.0

3.3

Laatste test

2024

2025

2026

Beschikbare maten

11

164

111

23

40

Nat

Petlas Imperium PT515

54%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Petlas Imperium PT515

66%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Petlas Imperium PT515

71%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Petlas Imperium PT515

55%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Petlas Imperium PT515

60%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Droog

Petlas Imperium PT515

46%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Droogremmen

Petlas Imperium PT515

63%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Droog rijgedrag

Petlas Imperium PT515

51%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Droge behandeling

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Soelaas

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Buitengeluid

Petlas Imperium PT515

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Inwendig geluid

Petlas Imperium PT515

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Soelaas

Petlas Imperium PT515

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Kosten

Petlas Imperium PT515

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Brandstofefficiëntie

Petlas Imperium PT515

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Kilometrage

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Imperium PT515

Roadhawk

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking