Vergelijking: Nokian WR C3 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Bovenmidden

Nokian

WR C3

R14 – R17

VS

Bovenmidden

Kumho

Vergelijk ook met

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

WR C3

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Aantal tests

1

10

6

4

Beste positie

#7

#2

#3

#2

Gemiddelde positie

7.0

6.0

4.7

3.3

Laatste test

2018

2026

Beschikbare maten

23

109

146

40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat

Nokian WR C3

31%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Nokian WR C3

33%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Nokian WR C3

25%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Nokian WR C3

33%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Nokian WR C3

33%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Nokian WR C3

25%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Sneeuw

Nokian WR C3

96%

Droog

Nokian WR C3

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Droogremmen

Nokian WR C3

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Droge behandeling

Nokian WR C3

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Soelaas

Nokian WR C3

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Buitengeluid

Nokian WR C3

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Kosten

Nokian WR C3

43%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Rolweerstand

Nokian WR C3

43%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Best snow tyres Best tyres for evs Beste ijsbanden Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Vergelijk ook

Nokian WR C3 vs Falken EuroWinter VAN01

Nokian WR C3 vs Continental VanContact Winter

Nokian WR C3 vs Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

Nokian WR C3 vs GT Radial Maxmiler WT2

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: Nokian WR C3 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

WR C3

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking