12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Nokian WR C3 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofiel

Nokian
WR C3
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Aantal tests
1
4
10
Beste positie
#7
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
7.0
3.3
6.0
Laatste test
2018
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
23
40
109

Nat

Nat
Nokian WR C3
31%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Nokian WR C3
25%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Nokian WR C3
33%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Nokian WR C3
33%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Nokian WR C3
33%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Nokian WR C3
25%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Droog

Droog
Nokian WR C3
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Droogremmen
Nokian WR C3
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Droge behandeling
Nokian WR C3
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
Nokian WR C3
96%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Nokian WR C3
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Buitengeluid
Nokian WR C3
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Inwendig geluid
Nokian WR C3
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian WR C3
43%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Rolweerstand
Nokian WR C3
43%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking