Vergelijking: Nokian WR C3 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Bovenmidden

Nokian

WR C3

R14 – R17

VS

Premie

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

9.7

R16 – R21

Vergelijk ook met

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

WR C3

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Aantal tests

1

4

28

Beste positie

#7

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

7.0

3.3

2.3

Laatste test

2018

2026

Beschikbare maten

23

40

67

Nat

Nokian WR C3

31%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Nokian WR C3

25%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Nokian WR C3

25%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

80%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Nokian WR C3

33%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Nokian WR C3

33%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

79%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Nokian WR C3

33%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

Droog

Nokian WR C3

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Nokian WR C3

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Droge stuurrespons

Nokian WR C3

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

96%

Droogremmen

Nokian WR C3

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

87%

Droge behandeling

Nokian WR C3

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

Sneeuw

Nokian WR C3

96%

Soelaas

Nokian WR C3

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

67%

Buitengeluid

Nokian WR C3

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

Inwendig geluid

Nokian WR C3

50%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

63%

Kosten

Nokian WR C3

43%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

74%

Rolweerstand

Nokian WR C3

43%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste sneeuwbanden Banden voor ev-auto's Beste ijsbanden Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Vergelijk ook

Nokian WR C3 vs Falken EuroWinter VAN01

Nokian WR C3 vs Continental VanContact Winter

Nokian WR C3 vs Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

Nokian WR C3 vs GT Radial Maxmiler WT2

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Bladeren op merk

GT

Vergelijking: Nokian WR C3 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

WR C3

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Sneeuw

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking