12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Nokian WR C3 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Nokian
WR C3
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
1
18
4
6
1
4
Beste positie
#7
#1
#2
#3
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
7.0
6.1
3.3
4.7
1.0
3.3
Laatste test
2018
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
23
47
40
146
66
40

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Nokian WR C3
31%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Nokian WR C3
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Nokian WR C3
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Nokian WR C3
25%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Nokian WR C3
25%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Nokian WR C3
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droog
Nokian WR C3
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droogremmen
Nokian WR C3
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Droge behandeling
Nokian WR C3
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Sneeuw
Nokian WR C3
96%
Soelaas
Nokian WR C3
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Nokian WR C3
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kosten
Nokian WR C3
43%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Nokian WR C3
43%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store