Vergelijking: Nokian WetProof vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Bovenmidden

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Also compare with

Turanza T005

PremiumContact 6

Ecsta HS52

Test profile

WetProof

Ventus Prime 4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Advantage

Aantal tests

14

13

18

14

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#8

Average position

5.6

6.2

6.1

13.4

Laatste test

2023

2026

2024

2026

Beschikbare maten

47

530

47

153

Nat

Nokian WetProof

84%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Nokian WetProof

72%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

59%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Nokian WetProof

81%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Nokian WetProof

86%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Nokian WetProof

85%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Nokian WetProof

91%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Natte zijgeleiding

Nokian WetProof

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Droog

Nokian WetProof

78%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Droogremmen

Nokian WetProof

87%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Droge behandeling

Nokian WetProof

80%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Nokian WetProof

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Soelaas

Nokian WetProof

79%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Buitengeluid

Nokian WetProof

86%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Soelaas

Nokian WetProof

87%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Inwendig geluid

Nokian WetProof

69%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Kosten

Nokian WetProof

60%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Rolweerstand

Nokian WetProof

61%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kilometrage

Nokian WetProof

56%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Prijs/waarde

Nokian WetProof

46%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Wederzijdse tests

Organisatie	Seizoen	Jaar	Maat
ADAC	De zomer	2023	205/55 R16	Bekijk

Vergelijking: Nokian WetProof vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

WetProof

Ventus Prime 4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Advantage

Test profile

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Wederzijdse tests

Voeg toe aan vergelijking