Vergelijking: Nokian WetProof vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Bovenmidden

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

WetProof

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Aantal tests

14

18

1

3

Beste positie

#1

#2

Gemiddelde positie

5.6

6.1

1.0

3.3

Laatste test

2023

2024

2025

2026

Beschikbare maten

47

64

40

Nat

Nokian WetProof

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Nokian WetProof

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Nokian WetProof

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Nokian WetProof

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Nokian WetProof

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Nokian WetProof

91%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Natte zijgeleiding

Nokian WetProof

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Droog

Nokian WetProof

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Droogremmen

Nokian WetProof

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Droge behandeling

Nokian WetProof

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Nokian WetProof

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Soelaas

Nokian WetProof

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Buitengeluid

Nokian WetProof

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Soelaas

Nokian WetProof

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Inwendig geluid

Nokian WetProof

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kosten

Nokian WetProof

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rolweerstand

Nokian WetProof

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kilometrage

Nokian WetProof

56%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Prijs/waarde

Nokian WetProof

46%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Nokian WetProof vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking