Vergelijking: Nokian WetProof vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Bovenmidden

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Also compare with

Turanza T005

PremiumContact 6

Ecsta HS52

Test profile

WetProof

Roadhawk

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Prime 4

Aantal tests

14

21

18

13

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

5.6

11.9

6.1

6.2

Laatste test

2023

2024

2026

Beschikbare maten

47

164

47

530

Nat

Nokian WetProof

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Nokian WetProof

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

59%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Nokian WetProof

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

71%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Nokian WetProof

85%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Nokian WetProof

86%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Nokian WetProof

91%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

Natte zijgeleiding

Nokian WetProof

89%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Droog

Nokian WetProof

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

81%

Droogremmen

Nokian WetProof

87%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

Droge behandeling

Nokian WetProof

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

79%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Nokian WetProof

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Droog rijgedrag

Nokian WetProof

71%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

Soelaas

Nokian WetProof

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Buitengeluid

Nokian WetProof

86%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

75%

Inwendig geluid

Nokian WetProof

69%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

73%

Soelaas

Nokian WetProof

87%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

72%

Kosten

Nokian WetProof

60%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Rolweerstand

Nokian WetProof

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Kilometrage

Nokian WetProof

56%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

70%

Prijs/waarde

Nokian WetProof

46%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

90%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Wederzijdse tests

Organisatie	Seizoen	Jaar	Maat
ADAC	De zomer	2023	205/55 R16	Bekijk

Vergelijking: Nokian WetProof vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4

WetProof

Roadhawk

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Prime 4

Test profile

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Wederzijdse tests

Voeg toe aan vergelijking