Vergelijking: Nokian WetProof vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Bovenmidden

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Vergelijk ook met

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofiel

WetProof

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Aantal tests

14

3

Beste positie

#1

#8

#2

Gemiddelde positie

5.6

13.4

3.3

Laatste test

2023

2026

Beschikbare maten

47

153

40

Nat

Nokian WetProof

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Nokian WetProof

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Nokian WetProof

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Nokian WetProof

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Natte zijgeleiding

Nokian WetProof

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Natte prestaties

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Droog

Nokian WetProof

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Droogremmen

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Droge behandeling

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Droog rijgedrag

Nokian WetProof

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Droge stuurrespons

Nokian WetProof

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Droge prestaties

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Soelaas

Nokian WetProof

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Buitengeluid

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Soelaas

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Inwendig geluid

Nokian WetProof

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kosten

Nokian WetProof

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rolweerstand

Nokian WetProof

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kilometrage

Nokian WetProof

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Brandstofefficiëntie

Nokian WetProof

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Nokian WetProof vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking