12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
3
18
4
1
28
Beste positie
#6
#1
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
9.0
6.1
3.3
1.0
2.3
Laatste test
2026
2024
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
91
47
40
66
67

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Droog
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Soelaas
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Kosten
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store