12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
3
18
21
4
28
Beste positie
#6
#1
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
9.0
6.1
11.9
3.3
2.3
Laatste test
2026
2024
2024
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
91
47
165
40
67

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Droog
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Soelaas
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Kosten
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store