12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofiel

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Continental
UltraContact
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Aantal tests
3
1
4
4
6
Beste positie
#6
#7
#3
#2
#3
Gemiddelde positie
9.0
7.0
12.0
3.3
4.7
Laatste test
2026
2023
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
91
88
111
40
146

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Droog
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Droogremmen
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Droge behandeling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Soelaas
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Buitengeluid
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Soelaas
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Kosten
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolweerstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometrage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store