12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Continental
UltraContact
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
3
1
10
6
4
Beste positie
#6
#7
#2
#3
#2
Gemiddelde positie
9.0
7.0
6.0
4.7
3.3
Laatste test
2026
2023
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
91
88
109
146
40

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Droog
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droge behandeling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Droogremmen
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Soelaas
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometrage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store