Vergelijking: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Ceat WinterDrive SUV vs. Viking WinTech vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Bovenmidden

Nokian

Powerproof 2

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

Powerproof 2

WinterDrive SUV

WinTech

UltraGrip Performance+

Aantal tests

3

1

6

23

Beste positie

#6

#3

#11

#1

Gemiddelde positie

9.0

3.0

20.8

3.3

Laatste test

2026

2025

2024

2025

Beschikbare maten

91

10

59

176

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat

Nokian Powerproof 2

67%

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

91%

Viking WinTech

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Nokian Powerproof 2

72%

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

92%

Viking WinTech

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Nokian Powerproof 2

72%

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

96%

Viking WinTech

62%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Nokian Powerproof 2

52%

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

90%

Viking WinTech

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Nokian Powerproof 2

75%

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

95%

Viking WinTech

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Nokian Powerproof 2

75%

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

68%

Viking WinTech

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Droog

Nokian Powerproof 2

68%

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

89%

Viking WinTech

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Droogremmen

Nokian Powerproof 2

74%

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

92%

Viking WinTech

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Droge behandeling

Nokian Powerproof 2

71%

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

85%

Viking WinTech

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Kosten

Nokian Powerproof 2

79%

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

94%

Viking WinTech

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Rolweerstand

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

94%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kilometrage

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Viking WinTech

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Soelaas

Nokian Powerproof 2

76%

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

83%

Viking WinTech

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Buitengeluid

Nokian Powerproof 2

77%

Ceat WinterDrive SUV

96%

Viking WinTech

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Best tyres for evs Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Beste handling banden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Vergelijk ook

Ceat WinterDrive SUV vs Nokian Hakka Blue 3

Ceat WinterDrive SUV vs Nexen N blue 4 Season 2

Ceat WinterDrive SUV vs BFGoodrich Advantage SUV All Season

Ceat WinterDrive SUV vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro

Viking WinTech vs Radar Dimax Alpine

Viking WinTech vs Giti Gitiwinter W2

Viking WinTech vs Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

Viking WinTech vs GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Ceat WinterDrive SUV vs. Viking WinTech vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Powerproof 2

WinterDrive SUV

WinTech

UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofiel

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking