12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Nokian Line SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Nokian Line SUVBovenmidden
NokianNokian

Line SUV

R15 – R19
Firestone RoadhawkBovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook ION EvoPremie
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Vergelijk ook met
PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5 Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Nokian
Line SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Aantal tests
5
21
18
1
Beste positie
#2
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
4.2
11.9
6.1
1.0
Laatste test
2017
2024
2024
2025
Beschikbare maten
33
165
47
66

Nat

Nat
Nokian Line SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Nokian Line SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Nokian Line SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Droog

Droog
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Droog rijgedrag
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Droogremmen
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Droge behandeling
Nokian Line SUV
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian Line SUV
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometrage
Nokian Line SUV
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rolweerstand
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Nokian Line SUV
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Buitengeluid
Nokian Line SUV
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Inwendig geluid
Nokian Line SUV
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Banden voor ev-auto'sBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenBeste handling bandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Vergelijk ook

Nokian Line SUV vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Nokian Line SUV vs Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVNokian Line SUV vs Nokian Wetproof SUVNokian Line SUV vs Nokian Hakka Blue 2Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Bladeren op merk

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking