12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Nokian cLine VAN vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Nokian
cLine VAN
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
1
18
6
3
Beste positie
#4
#1
#3
#2
Gemiddelde positie
4.0
6.1
4.7
3.7
Laatste test
2019
2024
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
16
47
146
34

Nat

Nat
Nokian cLine VAN
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Nokian cLine VAN
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Nokian cLine VAN
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Nokian cLine VAN
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Nokian cLine VAN
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Nokian cLine VAN
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Nokian cLine VAN
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Nokian cLine VAN
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Droog

Droog
Nokian cLine VAN
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian cLine VAN
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometrage
Nokian cLine VAN
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking